Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Can technical writing suck less

I would basically agree with the accepted answer that the main goal of technical writing is to assist someone in a task and it should focus on that. (Most of the time) you want to get a specific jo...

posted 5y ago by Sybille Peters‭  ·  last activity 4y ago by System‭

Answer
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T05:05:07Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/41926
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by user avatar Sybille Peters‭ · 2019-12-08T05:05:07Z (over 4 years ago)
I would basically agree with the accepted answer that the main goal of technical writing is to assist someone in a task and it should focus on that. (Most of the time) you want to get a specific job done and fast. I would say most of that applies to online documentation that needs to be terse like short howtos or reference.

However I do **disagree** that this must apply to **all** technical documentation and that you must always restrict yourself to dryness. I see no harm in being informed and entertained (if possible).

I think there are several ways to put some fun into documentation.

- Use a good design that makes the docs easily readable and aesthetically pleasing
- Add images (and or videos) to visualize things
- The problem with humor is that not everyone appreciates it. But, if you know your audience well, I think there is no harm in a pun or comic once in a while if it fits, example: [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DldA\_cIXgAADj5w.jpg](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DldA_cIXgAADj5w.jpg)
- Another example for terseness and fun to look are some technical sketchnotes. The technique can come in handy for cheat sheets 
- Add analogies and images to explain things, Example: [An introduction to HTTP/2 for SEOs](https://www.distilled.net/resources/an-introduction-to-http2-for-seos/) 

* * *

[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/x5EBb.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/x5EBb.png)

- Source: [https://xkcd.com/293/](https://xkcd.com/293/)
- License: [https://xkcd.com/license.html](https://xkcd.com/license.html)
#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2019-02-04T20:17:06Z (about 5 years ago)
Original score: 3